Sigma notation provides a way to compactly and precisely express any sum, that is, a sequence of things that are all to be added together. Although it can appear scary if you’ve never seen it before, it’s actually not very difficult. Here’s what a typical expression using sigma notation looks like:
We would read this as “the sum, as k goes from a to b, of f(k).” In plain English, what this means is that we take every integer value between a and b (inclusive) and substitute each one for k into f(k). This results in a bunch of values which we add up.
Let’s go through each part of that and see what they mean in more detail:
: this is a capital sigma, the eighteenth letter of the Greek alphabet. It is not an ‘E’! Sigma corresponds to the English letter ‘S’; ‘S’ is for ‘sum’.
- k: The k on the left side of the equals is called the index variable or the index of summation, or sometimes just the index. It will take on all the integer values between a and b (inclusive).
- a, b: a is the starting index and b is the ending index.
- f(k): this is the expression that describes each term in the sum. For each value of k between a and b, f(k) will be some value which gives one term in the sum.
If you’re still confused, don’t worry; an example should make things clear!
See how that works? We took every value of k between 2 and 5 inclusive, and substituted each into the expression 
As a bonus, once you understand sigma notation, you understand Big Pi notation for free: a Big Pi (
Pingback: More on repetend lengths « The Math Less Traveled
Pingback: minor mathhelp needed
Pingback: Irrationality of pi: curiouser and curiouser « The Math Less Traveled
Slight error in summation example: first iteration (2 squared minus 1) shows minus sign where it should be plus sign.
Hmm? I see a plus sign. The image gets kind of squashed, though, so maybe for some reason you’re not seeing the crossbar on the plus?
Is there a formula to express a certain number in sigma notation? if i gave you a number like 19018537475 could you express it in sigma notation and show me how you do it? please help me on this!!!
John: there are lots and lots of ways to express any number using sigma notation. For example, I could write your number as
or as
There are probably many more complicated ways to write it that require more cleverness to come up with. However, this is sort of a strange thing to do with sigma notation! It should be used to make writing complicated things simpler, not to make simple things complicated.
haha thanks
Using Sigma notation how could I express 24 using exactly thre 7′s?
Sorry previous question should read exactly three 7′s
Dave: I try not to answer questions of the form “solve this puzzle for me”. In any event, the question seems somewhat ambiguous — what are you allowed to use *besides* the 7′s?
Dave:
Sigma i = 0 to 2 (7 + i)
helpful, thank you
This is really helpful! thanks a lot!
Thank you for the explanation!
Pingback: Triangular number formula (Challenge #8) | The Math Less Traveled
Pingback: Rational numbers and decimal expansions | The Math Less Traveled
Is there a certain way how to figure out k? I am practicing for a test and my arithmetic series goes like so “8+5+2-1-4-7-10-13″ My mind always wants to say that k is equal to a sub n minus three, but I know that’s not correct. Do you have any tips on how to find out k? And would b or the ending index be 8 in this series? Thanks!
What if the k is too large for manually adding until the kth term?
what if sigma y=0? 3
Σ (x-y+3)^3
y=0
what will be the answer?
hope you understand. thankyou
)
it is quite easy especially for youngsters thanks tony SA
Pingback: Friday, September 9 | MATH 152, Fall 2011
Pingback: Perfect numbers, part I | The Math Less Traveled
This is pretty neat. So does two sigma signs sort of work like two for loops in MatLab?
If in each loop Im just performing an additive operation?
Yes, that’s right!
How would you find the sum of:
∑_(i=1)^n▒〖i^2+3i+4〗
Hi Rachel, I just wrote a post answering your question!
Pingback: Sigmas and sums of squares | The Math Less Traveled
sigma a^2 * ( b – c )
Can you explain the answer?
Actually I know the answer….but I don’t know how to arrive at the answer
I don’t understand the question. Sigma by itself does not mean anything, you have to specify what index you are summing over. Perhaps if you say what the answer is supposed to be that might help.
∑ (i= 3 to n) for (i^2-3)
anothr ques
∑(i=0 to n) fr ( i^2 +5)
Hi, you should be able to solve this using my explanation here.
Pingback: Differences of powers of consecutive integers, part II | The Math Less Traveled
Pingback: Differences of powers of consecutive integers, part II | The Math Less Traveled
hi, i find ur explanations really very interesting. i wud like to know if you have written something on the definition or explanation of definite integrals. If u havnt, can you plz tell me whr i shud look for it?
I haven’t written anything about definite integrals. You might be interested in looking at http://ocw.mit.edu/resources/res-18-001-calculus-online-textbook-spring-2005/ or at http://news.slashdot.org/story/04/03/04/028253/five-free-calculus-textbooks .
Thank you for this, really useful for someone like me whose maths has all fallen out of my head in the 10+ years since I last studied it. I do have one question – I’ve got an example that includes X bar on both sides of the equation, and I’m not certain what it means; does it simply represent the mean value of X for the given index?
Hmm, I don’t know, there’s not necessarily a single standard meaning for X bar. Check towards the beginning of the book or document where you found it to see if it defines the notation it is using, I guess.
It’s part of a course, and the lecturer just kind of casually dropped it in there! I shall approach him for clarification. Thank you again, this is a really nice resource for folks like me
This helped me understand the concenpt of sigma notation so much better! Thank you!
i am really confused
What are you confused about?
Very well explained. Thank you!
Thankx to this . ^___^
I’m still trying to understand the whole thing, as described above. One thing I don’t understand is why you towards the top wrote Sigma ‘E’ with b above, k=a below, f(k) to the right, and then a little bit later in your writing, moved the small numbers to the right of the ‘E’. Sorry if this makes me seem obtuse, but are you just writing it another way with the top and bottom numbers just to the right of the sigma symbol corresponding to those that were above and below it before, or does this new style of formula mean something else?
Ah, good question! They mean the same thing. Writing the top and bottom numbers just to the right of the sigma symbol is just a different style of writing it which takes less vertical space and is often used in the middle of a paragraph (instead of on a separate line all by itself).