MaBloWriMo 20: the group X star

So, where are we? Recall that we are assuming (in order to get a contradiction) that M_n is not prime, and we picked a smallish divisor q (“smallish” meaning q^2 \leq M_n). We then defined the set X as

X = \{ a + b\sqrt 3 \mid a, b \in \mathbb{Z}; 0 \leq a, b < q \}

that is, combinations of 1 and \sqrt 3 where the coefficients are between 0 and q-1. We defined a binary operation on X which works by multiplying and then reducing the coefficients \pmod q. This is not a group, since for example 0 doesn’t have an inverse. But in the last post we saw that we can make a group X^* simply by including only the elements from X that do have inverses.

Recall that \omega = 2 + \sqrt 3 is in X (as long as q is not 2—which it can’t be, since M_n = 2^n - 1 is odd), and we know that \omega \overline{\omega} = 1, so \omega has an inverse and we conclude \omega \in X^*.

You might enjoy figuring out what X^* looks like in the case q = 3. Tomorrow, we’ll start thinking about the implications of our assumption that s_{n-2} is divisible by M_n, and in particular what it means about the order of \omega in X^*.

Advertisements

About Brent

Assistant Professor of Computer Science at Hendrix College. Functional programmer, mathematician, teacher, pianist, follower of Jesus.
This entry was posted in algebra, arithmetic, group theory, number theory and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.